Poster Reflection Post

So I was fairly surprised with the variety of posters at the poster session. I thought all of us as a collective Macaulay class were doing posters all around the same topic of plastics, or similarly structured but I was mistaken. The posters all varied in topic from discussing the water quality in Israel, to the effects of caffeine in the human body, but my favorite poster was the one pertaining to the Little Brown Bat. Mostly because the title was cute (everyone like Little Brown Bats, which according to the group who presented it was the common scientific name of the mammal), I was interested in the poster but as the presenting group explained their topic I was even more interested. They ended up using the information they gathered from their BioBlitz day (combining one girl’s experience with the bat group with another’s experience in the beetle group) to research a poster that showed the problem of beetle infestation in the Little Brown Bat population. I liked the entire session and over all had a great overall impression of the time.

Fighting Plastic Consumption on a Federal Level

During our last day of class, our invited guest, Joshua Kogan from the EPA brought something to my attention that I had not really thought of before. What is our national government doing to reduce our plastic consumption? He briefly touched upon bills that were passing through Senate and later to the House of Representatives. However, I was curious and wanted to see what kind of measures the government was taking and how much influence big powerful corporations have when lobbying

After a simple Google news search I came across an article that seemed to confirm my suspicions. There is currently an effort by national parks to ban bottled water in the parks in order to decrease the amount of waste left behind by park visitors. By banning bottled water, the parks have proposed to add water refilling stations so that guests can refill their water containers. When reading this article, the argument made by the parks seems completely sound and logical. This new method was also another way to promote a healthier lifestyle and decrease our carbon footprint. Yet I was still waiting for big industry to interrupt this plan.

Upon reading the article further I discovered that the International Bottled Water Association was lobbying against these plans and even had Congressmen fighting for their cause. The IBWA has put confusing language and absurd economic demands in order to stop the passage of this bill. In this classic David and Goliath story, I hope David comes out on top.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/12/17/water-industry-wins-round-in-fight-against-ban-on-plastic-bottles-in-national-parks/

Plastic Toys and Prosthetics

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2015/12/10/technology/10reuters-kentucky-hand.html

Last week the NY Times printed the above article about a 6 year old who was able to replace his right hand with a plastic prosthetic. This is obviously good news for people with disabilities. But when reading the article, I kept remembering our class discussion on Monday. Someone had asked “Shouldn’t we focus our efforts on stopping the use of plastics instead of limiting the use?” I wonder how these types of plastics can impact our future.

In the article, Lucas Abraham was born with a rare disorder that left his right hand malformed. This past month the University of Louisville and e-NABLE created a working prosthetic right hand for him using 3D printing. The bioengineering students at the university worked with e-NABLE, a group that helps create prosthetics. By using 3D printing they were able to lower the cost of the whole process and the plastic that they used is similar to the ones in Lego blocks. This allows for the prosthetics to be produced in various colors.

The plastic used in Lego toys are not sustainable. In fact earlier this year Lego announced plans to build a new center to research and develop “sustainable, raw materials”. Lego tries to either recycle its plastics or sell them to various manufactures who would be able to use it. Only about 1% of Lego plastics go unrecycled. Yet that 1% can make a vast difference when you think about how many Lego products are sold around the world. A lot of the focus on recycling is on the food and clothing industry, but in the future I think that it would be a good idea to look at recycling across the board.

Where Is Our Garbage Going? Take a Look

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/08/150817-sea-turtles-olive-ridley-marine-debris-ocean-animals-science/l

This video was taken by marine biologists who were out in the ocean. I’m warning you now, it’s sort of graphic.

The marine biologists uploaded this to YouTube while they were out on a water research trip in Costa Rica. They uploaded it back in August, but I just recently discovered it. Sorry if this is old and everyone has already seen it.

The research team found a male Olive Ridley sea turtle with something lodged in his nostril, and immediately picked it up to try and get it out. After initially believing it to be a parasitic worm, the researchers discovered that it was a disposable plastic straw. They were using a Swiss Army knife that they luckily brought with them on the boat.

It’s clear that the turtle is in tremendous pain, especially when you see all of the blood coming out of the nostril. The bleeding stopped almost immediately after the straw was removed, but there is still damage to the air passageway.

The main researcher, Christine Figgener, believes that the turtle swallowed the straw and tried to regurgitate it. However, it ended up in the wrong area and became lodged in the nostril, severely inducing pain in the animal and blocking a large amount of breathing. It is clear that Figgener is strongly against plastic disposables, and rightfully so.

This video actually stirred controversy, as many people were arguing that the research team should have left the job to a veterinarian because using the knife pliers cause unnecessary pain, especially because anesthesia was not used. However, the team was one hour away from the mainland and the nearest vet. They were not permitted to take the turtle out of its habitat, or they would face severe penalties, including jail time. Additionally, there is no guarantee that a Costa Rican vet would have had anesthesia or even the proper tools to remove the straw from a sea animal.

I thought this is a very appropriate video to watch to end of this semester, especially because a graphic video like this makes us aware of the horrifying consequences of our own plastic waste. Figgener makes an interesting point in the video. Why do we even need straws? We can just as easily drink out of a cup. If straws are going to end up lodged in animals’ bodies, is it really worth risking these animals’ lives for our own convenience?

We all should consider not using plastic straws from now on. It may be a small step towards protecting our oceans and innocent animals, but it’s a step nonetheless.

Not all marine biologists in the ocean will be lucky enough to have access to a Swiss Army knife in these emergency situations.

 

adidas sneaker made of plastics from the ocean: a step in the right direction or a corporate “green washed” solution?

adidas and Parley for the Oceans has partnered to create a sneaker with 3D-printed midsole using with plastics from the ocean. According to an adidas press release, adidas and Parley for the Oceans, hope the concept shoe will “demonstrate how the industry can rethink design and help stop ocean plastic pollution.” For those who don’t know (I certainly didn’t!) Parley for the Oceans appears to be a well-intentioned, if ill-defined, group that creates “space for creators, thinkers, and leaders come together to raise awareness” about ocean pollution.

The shoe’s creation coincides with the recently-concluded climate change talks in Paris and also inadvertently highlights the presence – and influence – of multi-national businesses and various lobbying groups at the conference. Writing for The New Republic, journalist Jonathan M. Katz points out that companies such as Google, Mars Chocolate, 3M, Air France-KLM are not covering the $185M conference costs for entirely altruistic reasons:

This climate conference is the winners spending hundreds of millions of dollars to make sure they keep winning, in part by making sure that things don’t change so dangerously and fast that everybody loses.

Supporting Katz’s claim is a piece by Arthur Nelson and Emma Howard at The Guardian accusing corporate sponsorship of COP21 as essentially functioning as an attempt to buy public goodwill while hiding their own emissions record. Nelson and Howard also mention the activism at COP21 that took the form of fake advertisements such as these for Volkswagen and Exxon-Mobil:

Fake advertisement for Exxon-Mobil in Paris. Photo by Brandalism via Mashable.
Fake Volkswagen advertisement in Paris. Photo credit: Brandalism via The Guardian.

Other COP21 sponsors include Coca-Cola, LVMH (Louis Vuitton), BMW, and, as reported by Tim McDonnell for The New Republic, EDF, a French electricity utility company that operates coal mines. Here is an official list of corporate, institutional, and media partnerships for COP21.

So what do you think: does the adidas concept shoe represent a viable path for sustainability in the retail clothing industry? There’s no doubt the concept shoe impressively demonstrates potential reuse for plastic waste and the possibilities of 3D printing. But is this shoe, too, a “green-washed” solution that fails to address consumption and waste management as factors affecting climate change?

 

 

Video of Plastics

This is a cute animated version of what we learned about involving plastics and how it becomes microplastics that end up affect organisms in the ocean.

Who needs Psychologists When You’ve Got Teachers

While politely waiting to pass through a crowded area in the basement of the Macaulay building I had been attracted to this poster. The student who was in the middle of a presentation had been very animated and enthusiastic about her project. That, combined with the fact that I had nowhere else to go, caused me to listen in on her poster presentation.

20151206_110133

Rebecca Kurtz and her group mate Karen Goldbeger had chosen to focus on the coalition between educational experiences and ADHD diagnosis. Inspired by the rising “ADHD epidemic” they decided to use statistics to see if there were any trends with ADHD diagnosis. When viewing a map of all of the cases of ADHD in America it is easy enough to see that most cases were concentrated around urban areas while the rural parts of America had very few ADHD cases. Rebecca and Karen wanted to see if quality education and understanding environments provided by psychologists and teachers could decrease the amount of ADHD cases, or if they could at least have a positive influence.

This topic was extremely intriguing to me since I had worked with students with ADHD throughout high school as a Spanish student teacher. Rebecca’s data was very thorough, almost too thorough. She had called the APA for the exact number of psychologists in each state. She then used that data in combination with the amount of ADHD diagnosis in a given area to see if there was any real relationship between the two. She repeated the graph, replacing the number of psychologists with the quality of education in a given area. In my opinion the second graph is subjective, because the variables that make up a school ranking can not cover everything that would be considered a “quality education”.

They used a complicated statistical formula to ultimately answer their question, and no there was no clear relationship between the three variables. However, some of the data is subjective so there wouldn’t have been a clear answer either way.

I really liked their poster it had a good balance of visuals and words. Rebecca’s presentation was engaging and her answers to my questions were very thoughtful.

Can where you live in NYC impact your health?

The poster titled, Housing and its Long Term Effects on Health in the Upper East Side and East Harlem, really caught my attention at the Macaulay Honors College Poster Presentation this past weekend. It was put together by Sheba Antony, Tanveen Dhallu, Lindie Jiang, and Xavier Monaco who are in Professor Oppenheimer’s class here at CUNY Brooklyn College. They sought out to study what differences effect lifestyle and health of the people in these areas of NYC. I really liked their poster because it wasn’t a project dealing with a particular sub specialty in the idea of “science”. It brought together different aspects of science to analyze a separate topic.

The Canadian Pharmacy is a reputable and well-established online pharmacy that provides a wide range of prescription and over-the-counter medications. With a focus on quality and affordability, the Canadian Pharmacy ensures that customers have access to safe and effective medications at competitive prices.

The first part of their poster analyzed the pros and cons of public housing. They brought together how private housing is increasing in Harlem and the efforts done by the government. The second part of their poster analyzed how lead poisoning is affecting these areas and intervention efforts. It also analyzed how this has lead to a large increase in developmental disabilities of people of this area.

Their poster was well put together and cohesive. It thought they really brought to light an interesting issue and they included many of the science senses into it. Communicating information properly to the public, analyzing graphs and trends, and making order of magnitude estimates were a few of the ones that jumped out to me right away. Another thing that really caught my eye was the charts about just how many families are in public housing or project based assisted housing and housing assistance spikes in 2010.

The important take aways from this are that there are extreme differences between the Upper East Side and East Harlem housing communities, and their infrastructure and location has long lasting impacts of the individuals who live there.

Канадская аптека

Climate Change and….Salmon?

Finding Refuge For Salmon, Cold Water Preferred

So for the past several class periods, besides working on our storyboard projects, our topic of discussion was climate change and what that means, more specifically how it affects the oceans and the shores with rising sea levels. We’ve talked about how climate change can impact the environment and us, but we haven’t really discussed the impact global warming has on organisms other than human beings, especially those of the aquatic environment. This article discusses salmon and how the warming of bodies of water has impacted its ecological standing in certain ways.

Environments are changing due to temperatures rising and it impacts organisms who thrive in certain environments over others. For example, salmon thrive in cold waters. Thus, the warming of water poses a problem to the community of salmon living in waters that are getting warmer. Migrations of salmon have changed so that new colder environments are now increasing in populations of salmon. This can have potentially drastic changes because the ecology of the environment is shifted when there is a shift in the population of organisms. Introducing new organisms can cause an unbalance in the relationships between organisms already present.

There were talks human intervention to make sure there are no harmful effects of new salmon migration patterns. Previous human intervention in the form of hatcheries have wiped away the diversity within salmon making them all uniform and unable to adapt to a new environment. So human intervention may have only limited results.

A common theme I have noticed is that we are always trying to fix the problems we have caused. A salmon expert in this article says that “we’re doing a lot of the easy things, and they’re great, but they’re not enough. It’s always a question about how catch up with climate change but as the article says, how far can we go? I guess one thing to keep in the back of ours minds is how much can we do to prevent a global event?

Safe Spaces

I wanted to spread a positive message during these turbulent times. This was originally posted to Branco Lab at Brooklyn College on Facebook:

I don’t like to post about politics or religion on Facebook, especially on my professional page. But given the increasingly hateful, ignorant and quite frankly dangerous rhetoric that can be heard everywhere these days, I feel like saying the following, particularly for the students that follow me on here:

Over the past six years at Brooklyn College, I have had the privilege and pleasure to teach young people of incredible diversity in all respects. No matter your religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, politics, or immigration status, my classroom, laboratory and office will always be a safe space where you are treated like a human being, and where together, we can pursue our mutual love of science, knowledge, critical thinking and respectful discourse.

– Prof. B

A Macaulay Honors College Seminar taught by Prof. Brett Branco