Truth

When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see truth? Can we feel it?

If we examine an individuals understanding of the word truth, we can be surprised as how different another person can perceive it as. It is a word that probably has a connotation far more disconnected from what it is capable of. The truth can destroy; it’s really not all it’s made out to be. In simple words I can allude to a situation many of us have been in. Although we may see truth as something that has the fixed association to “good” and “just”, let’s face it, it is unbearable to hear. For some reason the truth is something that many of us cannot bear to hear. The reason? Illusion vs. reality. This struggle been the dominating factor in countless plays, plot lines, and works of art. There is always a conflict between these two forces, and in the end understanding the two existing ubiquitously is far more difficult than accepting one at a time. A reality can be the illusion of one person, and just as well be the vice-versa of another. It is rather paradoxical as we go even deeper into examining the verity of an illusion or the verity of a reality. Feeling “truth” in a work is even a harder concept to understand. It is a notion that fascinates me and perturbs the mind. I always wonder whether the artist feels the same way about a work years later. How “true” can the work feel days, months and years later. At any one moment we may feel more strongly about something than years in the future. Truth is also affected by how much he/she knows at the given moment of their creating their work of art. Whether it be in form of music or visuals, an artist expressing him/herself can easily shift their way of thinking with time. In the end I wonder how true truth is.

Truth in Art

When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see truth? Can we feel it?

Truth is defined as “the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or reality” (Merriam Webster Dictionary). Under this definition, truth is something that is universal, there is only one Truth. However, when placed into the context of different human individuals, different people can have conflicting perceptions of realities, and thus, a different personal truth. For example, a person with partial colorblindness might perceive a sweater to be dark grey, when in fact, to people without the disorder, it is red. Within that person’s reality the sweater is grey and “red” doesn’t have a definition. Art is something that is subjective and a person’s reaction to it depends on various factors, with large part in personal tastes. The reaction one person gets from viewing or listening to art is intrapersonal. A person can gain a personal truth from art, but as each person’s perception is individual, a person cannot see a universal Truth.

Feel the truth ?…

1. We can all agree that art is abstract. With this in mind, we are forced to recognize that what we see won’t be the same art that everyone else sees. We all have different experiences and will come to different conclusions. However, there is no way to “see” the truth of art. Truth is a concrete, indisputable fact set in reality. You cannot argue that 2 + 2 = 4. It’s impossible. But art is open to interpretation. It’s liberated from the confines of the labels of “true” and “false” because it can be whatever the viewer wants it to be, even if the artist spells out “the truth” within it. Art is free. Because of this, it is possible for art to conjure an emotion from the viewer. While we will never get the truth of the art unless we ask the artist, we may be able to pick up on how s/he was feeling at the time while viewing said art (hearing a sharp strike to a piano, seeing the fluid lines of a painting, watching the quick movement of a dancer). The viewer may also feel something that the artist might not have intended for them to feel at all. But feeling doesn’t depend on anyone but the feeler.The feelings that arise while we view art help add to it’s mystery and can make it an experience.

In Pursuit of Truth (?)

1. When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see the truth? Can we feel it?

I believe we cannot see nor feel truth because we don’t necessarily know what truth is. We are subject to our own perceptions, which hinders our abilities to ever see truth. Seeing (or listening to) art is attempting to view another’s ideals, but not necessarily truth. Artists can try to convey truth, but it is not possible because truth is subjective. We can see or feel emotions or thoughts, which is perhaps why they become most relevant in interpretation of art. This then implies the questions of whether or not emotions or thoughts are truth. Perhaps they are to some, but no one is ever sure because truth is abstract and undefined.

2. Medieval artists resorted to Geometry to express a spiritual truth, and Baroque composers built their cannon on a mathematical symmetry. Do these methods limit our definitions of truth and therefore of beauty?

Geometry and mathematics do not limit our definitions of truth; they elaborate them. As human beings, we find comfort and beauty in symmetry and patterns. By applying such tactics, we are satisfying our innate desires. That doesn’t mean that this application should be the only defining aspect of truth and beauty in art.

Truth in Art

“Sometimes lies are more dependable than the truth.” – Orson Scott Card

A true artist utilizes lying to communicate truth. The debate on feeling “truth” when viewing a work of art is an argument on the means to achieving a goal. What is the goal of an artist? An artist must express an emotion, an idea, a thought, etc. using a medium of their preference. For example, imagine a war veteran giving an anecdote to an audience on the first time he was required use a firearm. His goal is to simulate and evoke the emotions he felt during that moment of his life. Yes, it is possible for the man to describe the past event as it actually happened and to tell “the truth.” But sometimes, this truth isn’t good enough. If he were to describe the event as it actually happened, he would fail to make the audience feel the same emotions that he once experienced. Therefore, he exaggerates many aspects of his story when talking to the audience. He might even make up a few aspects of the story altogether. He lies in order to effectively communicate his emotions to the audience; he “lies” to tell “the truth.”

Thus, what is truth? Is it the image of fading sunlight over a river seen in a painting? Or is it the raw emotion that the artist wanted to communicate to the viewer? Perhaps the artist saw a waterfall and felt that the emotions would be better translated to the viewer if he had painted a sunset instead. Indeed, the artist would be lying, but he would also be telling the truth. I believe that whenever I view a piece of art, indeed, I am seeing a lie. But when I view the artwork and am able to conjure the same emotion that the artist intended me to feel, I am feeling the truth.

Truth ≠ Theory

1) When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see the truth?  Can we feel it?

When viewing or listening to a work of art, we cannot see the truth. We can only see our interpretation of the artist’s interpretation. By the time we comprehend what we are viewing, the truth could not be further away. Truth is fact. It is proven and widely accepted. Everything else is theory, and theory can perhaps be viewed through art.

2. Medieval artists resorted to geometry to express a spiritual truth, and Baroque composers built their cannon on a mathematical symmetry.  Do these methods limit our definitions of truth and therefore of beauty?

Creating art that is based on concrete, mathematical observations is the best way to convey truth. In order to be universal, truth and beauty need to express things that everyone can see, and mathematics is almost able to force art away from “intrinsic” observations. Math-loving artists deserve respect for their courage; they try to show what is actually there, so that more of their audience is able to relate to something concrete. This is a significantly more difficult task than the task of creating something abstract or unrealistic.

The Truth in Art

When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see the truth?  Can we feel it?

The truth is something that is different to each person. When two people tell the same story (and neither is making anything up), they both choose to include and exclude different details. While one may emphasize one instance in the story, the other may not see the importance in that instance and instead highlight another part. Both of these people are telling the “truth” and yet their truths are different. In art, the truth is up to interpretation. If the viewer manages to experience any bit of emotion put into the art, then the viewer has essentially seen the truth, or as much as it is possible to see.

Judging from this, the truth is, in fact, virtually nonexistent. Since the artist is not always going to be present to let the viewer know if the emotions felt are correct, there is no real way to tell if the truth has been seen. Thus, whatever each viewer feels is the truth to themselves and that is all that matters.

In Pursuit of Truth

Art lies. Inspect this human, face contorting, robe rippling, hand rising. The human is stone, not flesh nor life nor gentle give that is the truth of man. Glance down this street, mark the sun creeping over the water between buildings on the left, about half as far as one can see. There is no street, only a lines of pigment and oil brushed on canvas. That house so far away remains four feet from where one stands to look, and that house so near does too. The far house in truth is larger than the near, yet perhaps an inch by two, while the other dominates a foot by half. Listen to the sorrow and the torment of this music. But the instruments and players are without distress. Follow the rise of this leader in his time two thousand fifty eight years before last Wednesday, and watch his fall by night. But this young man is no leader, this dilapidated stage no ancient kingdom, and this fall no longer than a day before another rise. Even when art has truth – a man did rule a kingdom, a soul once suffered loss, a street did stretch into the distance, a sun did rise, a face did cringe – it only lies the better. Mixed with its tricks of perspective and tone, these small truths  merely render the lie more convincing, like a half-truth told to calm an anxious parent. Even now I lie, when I say art, abstract idea it is, may lie or have or do.

Yet art is no half-truth to calm, it is a bold-faced lie to drudge up some part of the soul that hears or sees. It riles and worries and inspires. Great art lies to tell great truth. When a child lies to a mother, he hides something, but when an artist lies, she reveals something. A fraction of the rage, the peace, the pain, the loss humanity has faced in infinite ways, arranged in an elegant composite of one face or phrase, while directly untrue, divulges to the viewer something deeply true about himself.

In Pursuit of Truth

1. When viewing a work of art, or listening to one, can we see

the truth?  Can we feel it?

Art may or may not represent truth. Even if it does represent ‘truth’, it represents the maker’s truth. For so many things in our lives, there is no one definitive truth. Math and science represent facts and truth; however,  some scientific theories might end up not being true at all, after it is disproved or replaced by another one.

Sometimes an artist’s ‘truth’ may resonate with us as we listen or look at it, then we might be able to feel it. Art can also distort or exaggerate the truth. Just like a caricature may be showing face characteristic the person has, but they are dramatized and even though the overall you will recognize the person in the caricature, he or she will not actually look like that. So whenever we look at any art, we also get the truth but through the eyes of the artist. Several artists may look at the same artist, but each one will also paint it a different way. They might each stress different features of colors of the sunset. Then there is also the interpretation of a work. So the “truth” intended in the art will get distorted several times in the process of creation and interpretation.

Geometry and Mathematics are Beautiful

I do not believe that the use of mathematical symmetry and geometry in art limits beauty or truth. Symmetry and order make up the world, and can be seen in both the human body and in nature. Tessellations, the Fibonacci sequence, the Golden Ratio, and fractals are all mathematical, yet seen as beautiful aspects of nature. The symmetry is what makes many things aesthetically pleasing, and without it, things can appear chaotic, and often ugly. When these same symmetries and shapes that are present in nature are represented in art, they do not limit the piece’s beauty—they contribute to it. Truth lies in order, and I think by creating something that is mathematically correct, an artist is being more truthful to the way things actually are than if he just painted without any set guidelines. While beauty and truth can definitely be seen outside of the mathematical realm, numbers and symmetry can add to a piece’s veracity and appearance.