Don Giovanni- NY Times Review

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/arts/music/don-giovanni-at-the-metropolitan-opera-review.html

October 14, 2011

Reckless in Seduction, if Not Onstage

By ANTHONY TOMMASINI

Since becoming the general manager of the Metropolitan Opera in 2006, Peter Gelb has made it a priority to persuade strong, successful directors from theater and film to take on major new productions. And why not? Opera is theater. In theory, gifted directors who are mostly new to opera should bring fresh, bracing perspectives to bear. (more…)

| Leave a comment

Asuncion review

http://www.thatwasnotveryravenofyou.com/post/11425196274/review-of-asuncion

Review of ‘Asuncion’

This is my far-too-long review and analysis of ‘Asuncion’, written by Jesse Eisenberg and directed by Kip Fagan. Be aware there are many spoilers, and I even discuss the ending, so please do not read this if you don’t wish to know anything that occurs in the show. Also please be aware this is a play still in previews, and things very well might change in the coming weeks. I will be seeing the show again in November, and I can add an update to my already far-too-long review at that time.

(more…)

| Leave a comment

All About Asuncion (interview)

http://www.theatermania.com/new-york/news/10-2011/all-about-asuncion_42588.html

All About Asuncion

Jesse Eisenberg and Camille Mana discuss the new Off-Broadway play about a trio of unlikely roommates.

By: Nick Orlando · Oct 15, 2011  · New York
Jesse Eisenberg
(© John Russo)
Jesse Eisenberg
(© John Russo)

Jesse Eisenberg has become one of the film world’s hottest actors, thanks to his work in such films as The Squid and the Whale, Zombieland, and The Social Network, for which he received an Academy Award nomination. However, Eisenberg is not only an actor, he’s a playwright — and he is currently co-starring with Justin Bartha and Camille Mana in his new play, Asuncion, being presented by the Rattlestick Theatre Company at the Cherry Lane. TheaterMania recently spoke to Eisenberg and Mana about this project.

(more…)

| Leave a comment

NY Times Review: Anthony Caro on the Roof

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/30/arts/design/anthony-caro-on-the-roof-at-the-metropolitan-museum-review.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

Bringing Heavy Metal to the Met’s Roof

Librado Romero/The New York Times

Anthony Caro on the Roof Five of the sculptor’s works, including “Midday,” front, and “Blazon,” are at the Met.

By KEN JOHNSON
Published: April 28, 2011

No one in the 1960s produced livelier, more infectiously playful sculpture than the British artist Anthony Caro, five of whose works now grace the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s rooftop garden.

Librado Romero/The New York Times

Mr. Caro, 87 and still working, at the Met this week.

Librado Romero/The New York Times

The oddly militaristic “After Summer, ” from 1968, is one of five pieces in the Met’s Anthony Caro show in the rooftop garden.

Librado Romero/The New York Times

“Blazon,” 1987-90.

Pursuing possibilities opened up by David Smith’s welded steel works, Mr. Caro took sculpture off the pedestal, stretched it out across the floor and expanded it into airy concatenations of brightly colored lines and planes made with industrial metal sheets, pipes, tubes and beams. Perfectly composed yet seemingly freely improvised, they gave the impression of color liberated from physical support, like paintings in space or visual jazz. Nothing in Pop Art came as close to capturing the decade’s groovy mood.

The authoritarian, arch-formalist critic Clement Greenberg was an admirer, friend and studio consultant. With characteristically imperious self-assurance, he told an interviewer in 1968, “Anthony Caro is a major artist — the best sculptor to come up since David Smith.” The Queen of England evidently concurred. She has knighted him and awarded him the Order of Merit.

A more surprisingly insightful fan is Charles Ray, the Los Angeles sculptor whose work deals in mind-altering manipulations of perception. As an undergraduate in the 1970s, Mr. Ray studied with Roland Brener, a former student of Mr. Caro’s.

Mr. Caro’s “Early One Morning” (1962) (which is not in the Met’s show) had a revelatory impact on the young Mr. Ray. This bright red sculpture offers a loose arrangement of rectangular metal pieces; thin, gently bent tubes; and I-beam sections arranged along a horizontal axis more than 20 feet long. In an interview with the art historian and critic Michael Fried, a long-time advocate of Mr. Caro’s work, Mr. Ray recalled being amazed by the sculpture, which seemed to him to be “compressing and expanding space in such a hallucinogenic way.”

“Not that this sculpture was prophetic of the coming youth culture involvement with drug experiences,” Mr. Ray added, “but it was so born in its time. It is so alive in its making that it seems unlikely ever to die. ‘Early One Morning’ is a work that I gauge myself by.”

The wrap-around cover photograph of the catalog for a retrospective of Mr. Ray’s work at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art in 1998 shows the nebbishy younger sculptor meditating on “Early One Morning,” courtesy of Photoshop.

Only one work selected for the new Met exhibition, “Anthony Caro on the Roof,” has that startling, newborn feeling. Sporting a brand-new coat of shiny, taxi-cab yellow paint, “Midday” (1960) has the look of a jaunty, industrial dinosaur. Raised on stout, rectangular legs at either end, an inclined I-beam bristling with nut-and-bolt fasteners supports two squarish steel elements — one lifted at a corner — and an upswept curved piece.

It was the breakout sculpture for Mr. Caro, who worked as an assistant to the British sculptor Henry Moore in the 1950s, and it still exudes a powerful, coiled animation. It seems crouched and ready to spring into an anything-is-possible era.

The Met’s show skips over the polychrome works of the early and mid-’60s to “After Summer,” an elephantine piece from 1968 that furthers the horizontal and fragmenting motifs of previous years while anticipating a consolidating, conservative turn in the ’70s and thereafter. Painted a nondescript pale gray, it consists of a series of cupped, quarter-circular sections bolted to a pair of beams extending 24 feet along the floor. It has an oddly militaristic feel, as if it were based on a design for an ancient Roman battle apparatus repurposed to take on Minimalism, the emphatically prosaic style by which Mr. Caro’s kind of sweet, formal lyricism would be totally eclipsed by the end of the decade.

After the ’60s, the idiosyncratic exuberance and delight in sensory experience of Mr. Caro’s early work is overridden by a determination to uphold the presumably enduring values of high Modernism. You wonder if the influences of friends like Greenberg and Mr. Fried, who dismissed most new art of the ’60s as merely entertaining novelties, may have helped to suppress Mr. Caro’s more imaginatively innovative side and to inflate a more grandiose ambition.

Remarking on Mr. Caro’s roots in English tradition, Greenberg wrote in a 1965 essay, “Without maintaining necessarily that he is a better artist than Turner, I would venture to say that Caro comes closer to a genuine grand manner — genuine because original and un-synthetic — than any English artist before him.” No artist should take that kind of statement seriously, but it seems that Mr. Caro found it hard to resist.

The show’s last three works find him looking more to the past than to the present or the future, and striving, ponderously, for a grand manner. “Odalisque” (1984) — a chunky, compacted assemblage of hemispherical shells cut from big nautical buoys, giant old chain links and part of a steel boat deck — is undeniably suave, but dully so. Its Cubist, harmonious dissonance would not have shocked anyone in the avant-garde of the 1950s.

“Blazon” (1987-90) is overtly and all too literally architectural. With a column at left that’s almost 12 feet tall, an arch-shaped slab above inwardly angled walls and a railing of thin rods across the front, it resembles an oversize model for a Postmodern hotel balcony. The brick-red paint covering the grainy steel only enhances an unintended air of kitschy, Italianate Neo-Classicism.

More intriguingly enigmatic, albeit still heavy-handed, is “End Up” (2010), a boxy, Dumpster-size construction of rusted steel plates, cast iron and wooden timbers. It looks like something that was hauled up from the bottom of the sea — part of an ironclad from the Civil War, maybe — varnished for a history museum display. The rounded shoulder of a ship’s bollard emerges on one side, adding a vaguely surrealistic, organic element. A rectangular window admits a view into a shadowy but empty interior; there is no mystery there. For better or worse, the gratifications of Mr. Caro’s art have always been on the outside.

At 87, Mr. Caro is still going strong. He is now working on an immense, multipart sculpture that will occupy three blocks of Midtown Park Avenue traffic medians next year. No doubt it will be a thing of imposing grandeur. All the more reason for an enterprising museum curator to revisit the time half a century ago when Mr. Caro and the Western world were momentarily possessed by a spirit of joyful, devil-may-care optimism.

“Anthony Caro on the Roof” runs through Oct. 30 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art; (212) 535-7710, metmuseum.org.

A version of this article appeared in print on April 30, 2011, on page C1 of the New York edition with the headline: Bringing Heavy Metal to the Met’s Roof.
| Leave a comment

Theater Mania Review: The Bald Soprano

http://www.theatermania.com/off-broadway/reviews/09-2011/the-bald-soprano_41285.html

Reviewed By: Chris Kompanek · Sep 26, 2011  · New York

Bradford Cover and Rachel Botchan
in <i>The Bald Soprano</i><br />
(© Jacob J. Goldberg)” border=”0″ /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align=Bradford Cover and Rachel Botchan
in The Bald Soprano
(© Jacob J. Goldberg)

Eugene Ionesco’s masterful absurdist play, The Bald Soprano is as fresh as ever in Hal Brooks’ spot-on production for the Pearl Theater Company, currently playing at City Center’s Stage II.

As the play opens, we meet the Smiths (Bradford Cover and Rachel Botchan) who have just finished dinner and are relaxing in their living room. They speak to each other like strangers, recounting banal details and pausing awkwardly. This is also true of their friends the Martins (Brad Heberlee and Jolly Abraham) who arrive shortly afterwards.

While they wait for their hosts to greet them, the couple realize that despite looking very familiar, neither can remember who the other is. Through a series of questions, they discover that they do, in fact, share the same apartment and even the same bed.

Much of the dialogue appears completely illogical on the surface and needs a skilled director to tease out the humanity that abounds in the subtext, and Brooks pays close attention to the rhythm of the language which drives the play.

The work could even be divided into acts based on rhythmic structures: the fast and slow contrasts of cadence in the Smiths’ opening exchange, the pitter-patter exchange of questions between the Martins, the Socratic inquisitions regarding a mysterious doorbell, and finally, the climax of cascading non-sequiturs that floods the play’s climax.

The piece is brought to life by the Pearl’s wonderfully talented company of actors, who — in addition to the four leading players — includes founding member Robin Leslie Brown who plays Mary, the Smiths maid who has grown delirious through years of servitude, and veteran member Dan Daily as the fire chief who’s lost without his fires.

Harry Feiner’s set echoes this discord with an austere and realistic living room that could be plucked right out of Norman Rockwell, except for the back wall, which appears to be more or less upside down. It’s the perfect metaphor for this delightfully offbeat work.

| Leave a comment

Theater Mania Review: Intringulis

Reviewed By: Dan Bacalzo · Sep 27, 2011  · New York

The secret life of an illegal immigrant is revealed in Carlo Alban’s solo play, Intringulis, at Intar. Based upon the writer/performer’s own life, the 90-minute piece corrects some common misconceptions that some may hold in regards to the subject, while also showcasing the young actor’s gift for storytelling.

At the age of seven, Alban left his native Ecuador and moved to the United States, along with his parents and older brother Angelo. They arrived under the pretext of a tourist visa, but had already made plans to stay on a more permanent basis. Thus began a life of secrets and lies for the entire Alban family, who constantly lived with the fear and paranoia of being found out and sent away.

Alban proves to be a charismatic storyteller, easily winning the audience over to his side as he describes the various forged documents that enabled his family’s stay in the U.S., as well as their eventual successful bid for citizenship. Along the way, he charts his own efforts to become a normal American kid — or at least play one on TV as a cast regular on Sesame Street.

Not only does the writer/performer share first-hand accounts of his experiences, he also takes on the personas of other individuals. The most intriguing is his depiction of his older brother Pacelli — who stayed in Ecuador along with three other adult siblings when the Alban family moved to America — and who now feels a lingering bitterness and resentment about being left behind.

Interspersed between the various stories are Spanish-language revolutionary folk songs, which Alban sings with passion. Unfortunately, the sequence in which he takes up the electric guitar to perform a number that’s closer to heavy metal is not as successful.

Raul Abrego’s scenic design is dominated by large black slates onto which Erik Pearson projects an effective video design that incorporates family photographs, images taken from news outlets, and other materials. The slate surfaces are also used by Alban as chalkboards, reinforcing the show’s educational aspects without undermining its emotional impact.

| Leave a comment

Show Business Review: Intringulis

http://showbusinessweekly.com/article-1902-intringulis.html

By Ethan Kanfer

41327a

Photograph: Carol Rosegg

As an election year looms on the horizon, we are sure to hear plenty of perspectives on the hotly debated issue of illegal immigration. While the politicians trade statistics, theater artists are responding with powerful dispatches from inside America’s grey zone of citizenship. Last year’s De Novo examined the legal labyrinth in which many undocumented immigrants find themselves trapped. Now, the Intar Theatre adds to the cultural conversation with a touching and funny solo effort by the versatile Carlo Alban.

At the beginning of the evening, and in certain select spots throughout the show, Alban picks up his guitar and sings the songs of Nueva Canción artists like Victor Jara and Violeta Parra. It’s the music of his parents’ generation, an echo of a more idealistic era in Latin American history. The words still have meaning for Carlo, but by the 1980’s his mother and father no longer hope for a good life in their home country of Ecuador. Their new dream is to get to the United States, and when a tourist visa is granted, they seize the opportunity to relocate. Leaving four adult children behind, the Albans settle in New Jersey, where counterfeit papers enable them to work. But despite the family’s ordinary appearance, their toehold in middle-class America is perpetually threatened by a lack of authentic documentation. Under the circumstances, it would seem sensible to keep a low profile, but when Carlo exhibits a passion for show business, his loving mother and father won’t stand in the way of his dreams. He appears in community theater and even lands a recurring role on Sesame Street. As he grows into his teens, Carlo’s life resembles that of a typical suburban kid. He smokes pot, adds grunge and heavy metal to his musical repertoire, and aids his older brother in testing the limits of his parents’ authority. Inside, though, he feels like something of an outsider, chronically aware of the fragility of his situation.

However, through luck, determination and ingenuity, the Albans eventually get on the track to citizenship. But the saga doesn’t stop there, nor is its ending an entirely happy one. Carlo’s brother Pachely, now a civil rights lawyer in Ecuador, comes to visit only to find that the distance between him and Carlo is more just geographical. When Carlo’s adopted country is attacked by terrorists, his sense of national identity is concretized. But Pachely views things from a different angle, seeing an intringulis—a hidden agenda—of American manipulation behind much of the suffering and injustice in the world. The resulting ideological rift takes its toll on the family.

There are so many intriguing characters and complex arguments here that Alban would do well to consider a full-cast treatment of the same story. But if the one-man form has limitations, it also has its advantages, especially with such a charismatic and multi-talented performer at center stage. Displaying remarkable versatility, Alban morphs into a host of compelling characters, including from family members to a New Jersey barfly to an undocumented window washer hoping to bring his wife and child to America some day. His monologues are written with a keen sense of the poetry of everyday speech and with a delicate touch that encapsulates both the humor and melancholy in the characters’ thought processes. He is given ample production support by Erik Pearson’s projections, Julian Mesri’s sound design, Raul Abrego’s flexible set and Jorge Arroyo’s fluid lighting design. Director David Anzuelo keeps pace tight and weaves the show’s multitude of vignettes into a coherent and moving whole.

Intringulis; Written and performed by Carlo Alban; Directed by David Anzuelo; INTAR Theatre, 500 West 52 Street, New York, NY.

| Leave a comment

Time Out NY Review: The Bald Soprano

http://newyork.timeout.com/arts-culture/theater/2002645/review-the-bald-soprano

The Bald Soprano
Photograph: Jacob J. Goldberg

In the late 1940s, Eugène Ionesco’s sense of humor was piqued by a primer he was using to learn English. The banality of the lessons’ sample dialogue—the coldness of the expository communication between married couples, for example—inspired him to write his first play, 1950’s The Bald Soprano, in which a veddy English couple entertains another veddy English couple in their veddy English home. At first, their conversations are merely stuffy and formal; then they become a hash of contradictions, non sequiturs and absurdly precipitous changes of mood. The middle-class English drawing room is recast as a formalist fun house in which language is unhinged from communication, and logic from reality.

Echoes of Ionesco’s extended neo–Dadaist sketch have been heard since in everything from Monty Python to Steve Martin and beyond, and it retains a strong comic voice even today. But the cartoonishness of The Bald Soprano’s style is hard to limn right. Hal Brooks’s production at the Pearl Theatre Company is handsomely appointed—the upside-down china and photographs of Harry Feiner’s set are a nice touch—and earns several good laughs. Although the cast of six performs credibly throughout, however, only Rachel Botchan’s Mrs. Smith seems completely at ease in Ionesco’s zone. And despite Brooks’s efforts to keep the stage active, the show loses comic momentum as it drives toward the verbal disintegration of its finale. When it should be veering madly off the road, the amusement shifts to park.

| Leave a comment

NYTimes Review: The Bald Soprano

http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/theater/reviews/ionescos-bald-soprano-at-city-center-review.html?src=twrhp
September 27, 2011
Theater Review | ‘The Bald Soprano’

Our Lives Are So Similar. Oh, We’re Married!

By JASON ZINOMAN

Kenneth Tynan was among the first English critics to recognize how influential Eugène Ionesco was going to be, and one of the first to panic about it.

Tynan famously worried that Ionesco’s assault on realism did not engage with the world and that his popularity would lead theater down a blind alley. In his original 1956 review of “The Bald Soprano” he recognizes it as a masterpiece, but tellingly does not rave about its formal daring or snarky portrait of bourgeois rituals. Tynan makes the play sound like a riotous comedy.

He would have liked the Pearl Theater’s giddy slingshot of a production, staged with precise, farcical timing by Hal Brooks. Ionesco, of course, did not lead down an alley so much as open up new artistic vistas explored by writers like Harold Pinter, Caryl Churchill and Edward Albee. So in an age when departing from realism doesn’t seem so avant-garde anymore, this production treats the short play as an old-fashioned farce about two couples lost in their own heads.

Harry Feiner’s living room set has the eerie, symmetrical design of a frame from a Stanley Kubrick movie. The bowler on the hat rack is a nod to Beckett, and the clouds on the blue carpet indicate that this world is upside down.

Mrs. Smith (a chipper Rachel Botchan) rambles on in small talk, while with mock gravitas her husband (Bradford Cover) clicks his tongue in response. In the next scene a second couple (played with verve and wide-eyed innocence by Brad Heberlee and Jolly Abraham) marvel at the things they have in common before realizing they are married.

The play satirizes a kind of middle-class, suburban banality, but that’s not what’s interesting about it. Its famously off-kilter exchange of pleasantries is a mockery of logic, appearing like small talk but then veering off course into random nonsense. A reference to Sherlock Holmes underlines its challenge to rationality to explain the world. But mostly the musical banter of the dialogue in this staging is deliriously silly fun, starting with a rat-a-tat-tat sound of a bubble-gum pop song before accelerating into a punk rock mess.

In this production the play seems lighter, less derisive. This “Bald Soprano” taps into a simple, innocent humor that at its best captures the delight of watching a toddler learning how to talk.

| Leave a comment