Written Work

Written Work

Selected Recommendations for Final Essay:

Interdisciplinary, Classics, Comparative Literature, and Philosophy

  • Boyer, Paul. When Time Shall Be No More, Harvard UP, 1992
  • Cohn, Norman. Cosmos, Chaos, and the World to Come; The Pursuit of the Millennium, 1957
  • Fuller, Robert.. Naming the Anti-Christ, Oxford UP 1995
  • Gould, Stephen Jay. Questioning the Millennium, Harmony books, 1997
  • Guyatt, Nicholas. Have a Nice Doomsday. Harper Perrennial, 2007
  • Keller, Catherine. Apocalypse Now and Then, Beacon Press, 1996; God and Power, Fortress Press, 2005
  • Lifton, Robert Jay. Super Power Syndrome, Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books, 2003
  • Long, Thomas. AIDS and American Apocalypticism, SUNY Press, 2005
  • Manley, Roger, et al. The End is Near, Dilettante Press, 1999 (artwork and essays)
  • Pippin, Tina. Apocalyptic Bodies, Routledge, NYC, 1999
  • Quinby, Lee. Anti-Apocalypse, Minnesota UP, 1994; Millennial Seduction, Cornell UP 1999
  • Weber, Eugen. Apocalypses, Harvard UP, 1999
  • Weissman, Alan. The World Without Us. St. Martin’s Press, 2007
  • Wojcik, Daniel. The End of the World as We Know It, New York UP

English

  • Frykholm, Amy Johnson. Rapture Culture, Oxford UP 2004 (on Left Behind Series)
  • LaHaye, Tim, and Jerry Jenkins. Novels from the Left Behind Series
  • MacDonald, Andrew. The Turner Diaries
  • McCarthy, Cormac. The Road, Alfred A. Knopf, 2006
  • O’Leary, Stephen. Arguing the Apocalypse, Oxford UP 1994
  • Quinby, Lee. Selected chapters from Anti-Apocalypse and Millennial Seduction
  • Vaughan, Brian K. Y: The Last Man, Vertigo Series

Selected Online Sites:

 

Evaluation criteria for written work:

From a list by Lewis Hyde, edited by Sue Lonoff, with thanks to Richard Marius's writing handbook.

The following remarks are intended to give you a sense of criteria for grading papers. Note that four topics recur: thesis, use of evidence, design (organization), and basic writing skills (grammar, mechanics, spelling).

The Unsatisfactory Paper.

The D or F paper either has no thesis or else it has one that is strikingly vague, broad, or uninteresting. There is little indication that the writer understands the material being presented. The paragraphs do not hold together; ideas do not develop from sentence to sentence. This paper usually repeats the same thoughts again and again, perhaps in slightly different language but often in the same words. The D or F paper is filled with mechanical faults, errors in grammar, and errors in spelling.

The C Paper.

The C paper has a thesis, but it is vague and broad, or else it is uninteresting or obvious. It does not advance an argument that anyone might care to debate. "Henry James wrote some interesting novels." "Modern cities are interesting places."

The thesis in the C paper often hangs on some personal opinion. If the writer is a recognized authority, such an expression of personal taste may be noteworthy, but writers gain authority not merely by expressing their tastes but by justifying them. Personal opinion is often the engine that drives an argument, but opinion by itself is never sufficient. It must be defended.

The C paper rarely uses evidence well; sometimes it does not use evidence at all. Even if it has a clear and interesting thesis, a paper with insufficient supporting evidence is a C paper.

The C paper often has mechanical faults, errors in grammar and spelling, but please note: a paper without such flaws may still be a C paper.

The B Paper.

The reader of a B paper knows exactly what the author wants to say. It is well organized, it presents a worthwhile and interesting idea, and the idea is supported by sound evidence presented in a neat and orderly way. Some of the sentences may not be elegant, but they are clear, and in them thought follows naturally on thought. The paragraphs may be unwieldy now and then, but they are organized around one main idea. The reader does not have to read a paragraph two or three times to get the thought that the writer is trying to convey.

The B paper is always mechanically correct. The spelling is good, and the punctuation is accurate. Above all, the paper makes sense throughout. It has a thesis that is limited and worth arguing. It does not contain unexpected digressions, and it ends by keeping the promise to argue and inform that the writer makes in the beginning.

The A Paper.

The A paper has all the good qualities of the B paper, but in addition it is lively, well paced, interesting, even exciting. The paper has style. Everything in it seems to fit the thesis exactly. It may have a proofreading error or two, or even a misspelled word, but the reader feels that these errors are the consequence of the normal accidents all good writers encounter. Reading the paper, we can feel a mind at work. We are convinced that the writer cares for his or her ideas, and about the language that carries them.

Copyright © 2002, 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Permission is granted to non-profit educational institutions to reproduce this document for internal use provided that the Bok Center's authorship and copyright are acknowledged.