Alexander String Quartet

Although I recognize the beauty and talent needed to perform classical music, I must admit it's not that interesting to me. I played violin from fourth grade through high school, so I know the dedication it takes to become a good a violinist. I respect the performers in that sense, since they achieved a level of talent that I could never touch, but I can't help but like things more outside of the box. Juxtaposing this with the performance at Carnegie Hall, or even the incredible show at BAM, left me craving something a little less conventional. But, now that that's out of the way ...

My favorite piece was the Schumann Quartet in A Minor, Op. 1, No. 1. While it started off slow and tranquil, there lied an ominous or mournful tone within it. I couldn't really decide which of the two adjectives described it best, it depends on whether you would rather think that the bad events already happened or if they are still to come. A couple minutes into it, the piece switched gears and turned lighter, a little more carefree, as demonstrated by the spritely pace of the bows that contrasted the languid pace in the beginning. The piece seemed to build very well. It would separate the periods of quick bow motion with slower, more calming music. It created a sense of anticipation within the audience, allowing us to miss the fast pace and wait for it's return. 

The performers were very talented. As I said in my post about the Carnegie Hall performance, it's extremely admirable to be able to perform without a conductor and rest all your trust with your fellow musicians. They played well, followed their cues to each other, and pleased the audience with their music. I only wish I had that much of a gift when I played violin.